Category Archives: Web Accessibility

The ten point business case for web accessibility

At the risk of being typecast as a curmudgeonly blogger I am forced to wonder how serious the commitment to government web standards and accessibility really is. Government is indicating that more and more services are to be offered online which means a strong business case for accessibility is necessary.

What is particularly worrying is the plethora of government and quasi-government public service related web sites which are not core government departmental sites. They are not held accountable or required to meet government web standards, and, in particular, accessibility standards.

Many of these sites have a public education, information or public participation function and may be more relevant to many people than the corporate sites of their parent government organisations. Yet many of these sites evidence a complete lack of consideration of any accessibility features and are exclusive of some of the people who may most need the content they contain.

This is an indication of the compliance mentality, the lack of development of a business case for accessibility and a limited understanding of the value of accessibility that leads to a minimalist tick box approach.

Accessibility is about:

  • attitude
  • audience
  • an inclusive approach.

The business case for web accessibility

  1. The business case for accessibility is linked closely to organisational purpose and function. Integration of web accessibility into communication and business plans and strategies is fundamental and should be linked to other accessibility policies, projects and programmes.
  2. Understanding the audience/s is critical. It is a given that older people and a variety of disabled people with accessibility requirements beyond screen readers will be part of that audience.
  3. Accessible sites – and particularly sites that use CSS effectively – will be easier (and therefore cheaper) to manage and maintain because they are well structured and because changes to the appearance of the site can be made globally with changes to a single line of code in one file.
  4. Well-structured content will make the site more usable for everyone.
  5. Accessible sites will work with different browsing technologies, mobiles, tablets and so on and appear higher in search engine ratings.
  6. Accessible files tend to be smaller, which has two impacts. First, download time will significantly improve, which is important because people will leave if a site is too slow to download. There is still a number of users who access the internet via dial-up.
  7. Accessible sites are not limited. Using rich and diverse means of communication within a web site will create different ways of communicating the same information.
  8. General usability will be enhanced. Good publicity may be a spin-off, but perhaps one of the most important considerations is that accessibility will increase the site’s reach to include previously excluded audiences. If a site works well for disabled people it will work well for everyone.
  9. For government, accessible sites will contribute to the implementation of the Disability Strategy and the Convention of the Rights of Disabled People (CRPD.) They will assist people to participate in e-government, and its development in New Zealand.
  10. They may also help avoid Human Rights complaints which can be costly in time and resources.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Information Accessibility, Web Accessibility

Website Awards in focus

In his blog post entitled “Why award-winning websites are so awful” Gerry McGovern  says “Practical and functional websites rarely win prizes for design but they do win sales and make profits, … The Web is a functional, practical place. A great website drives the customer to act… The shiny surface wins awards. Real substance wins customers.”

Sadly, the same goes for web accessibility awards as for other web awards.
We have noticed that in reality accessibility of web sites that win awards is not always perfect. While awards are offered to encourage accessibility in design and build of web sites as well as reward those that are truly accessible must be attention given to accessibility standards and best practice.
We were therefore surprised and disappointed to see the , ALGIM accessibility award winner, the Rangitikei District Council http://www.rangitikei.govt.nz/ with a site that was far from accessible. It seems that there are still some misconceptions around accessibility. Giving a nod in the direction of accessibility will just not do.
This reflects a wider problem of a lack of understanding that disabled people and others who face information barriers are customers and users of web sites. For some it may be the only, or the best way of finding information they can use.
Accessibility is still not taken seriously enough by some, it is seen as a lightweight consideration, a “nice to have” if time, energy and resources permit, but not important. The effectiveness, elegance and plain common sense of universal design principles are still not widely grasped.
Some examples of fundamental accessibility errors from the winning site are;

  • Lots of “read more” links which with no information for a screen reader user tabbing through links
  • Inaccessible CAPTCHAs on the form for collecting information for a community organisation database and the fix-it form
  • Incorrectly marked up tables for layout on several pages
  • Headings are used for formatting rather than for syntactical structure and there is incorrect heading hierarchy structure
  • Accessibility statement with the access keys is only findable using the site map.
  • The location map does not meet the colour contrast standard.

If this is the best there is, and no sites are of a sufficient standard then it would be best if no award was made.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Web Accessibility

Introducing Web Accessibility

Around 20% of people can’t access the information on your web site, and the other 80% could be having a much better experience.

Global Accessibility Awareness Day logo - orange globe on grey background

Today is the first Global Accessibility Awareness Day.
There is also a Facebook page.

Making sure your web site adheres to international standards (WCAG) and national  standards (NZ government) is a good start but won’t necessarily give you a truly accessible web site. Having an inclusive mindset towards accessibility and your users will also help.

Try a few simple things and take a little time to experience what a lack of accessibility means. Unplug your mouse, touchpad or trackpad and try navigating around your site.  Using the keyboard only (tab/shift tab, arrow keys, enter and spacebar) navigate and interact with your own or your favourite websites and applications. You may discover a few problems you never thought about. Blind people and people with some physical impairments don’t use a mouse.

One accessibility problem I often encounter is poor contrast between text and background.  It is a very common problem on many web sites. No matter how much those of us with low vision enlarge the critical text or navigation poor contrast means it cannot be read. Some sites also create difficulty for people with colour blindness. Test the contrast on your own site using one of the testing tools available from Juicy Studio or Vision Australia.

Accessibility is not only about the technology or the design, important though they are. It is also about the content.  Analyse the language on your web site. How easily can it be understood by the average user?

Making web sites accessible to people who encounter particular barriers when using the Internet will mean a better user experience for everyone.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Information Accessibility, Web Accessibility

Health literacy for grown-ups

The other day my chiropractor recommended the Straighten Up New Zealand (SUNZ) programme. When I told him I could only find the kids’ version on the leaflet stand he explained that the kids’ version was the best as it was easier to understand. A pragmatic decision to use material designed for kids might just about be OK, if the adults’ version doesn’t work, but I feel patronised using something designed for children. Not the best way to engage my participation.

I wondered why the original material was developed without understanding the audience or testing the draft. Perhaps the kids’ version should be adapted for an adult audience, using the same simple style of drawings, plain English and large print in a easy to read font.

The SUNZ web site looked promising, with different audiences identified on the home page, although the slabs of bright colour are a bit hard on the eyes, but then the grown-ups page is all sad slabs of boring grey text, and the practitioners will need sunglasses for their page. This site cries out for some video, with captions and transcriptions of course.

Note – I didn’t check the web site for accessibility.

Straighten Up New Zealand - Grown ups introduction page - grey block text

Straighten Up New Zealand - Grown ups introduction page

Leave a Comment

Filed under Information Accessibility, Web Accessibility